From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nunez v. New York State Parole Division

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 4, 2001
284 A.D.2d 333 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

Submitted May 4, 2001.

June 4, 2001.

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to vacate a parole warrant for failure to timely hold a parole revocation hearing, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Peter C. Patsalos, J.), dated May 11, 2000, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Edusin Nunez, Otisville, N.Y., appellant pro se.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney-General, New York, N.Y. (Michael S. Belohlavek and Melanie L. Oxhorn of counsel), for respondent.

Before: GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, J.P., SONDRA MILLER, LEO F. McGINITY, ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, JJ.


ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Supreme Court properly denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding. The period of time within which the respondent had to act did not begin to run until the petitioner was released from Federal custody. Only then could the petitioner be held in the respondent's custody exclusively pursuant to the warrant he is now challenging. Since it is clear that this had not yet occurred when the petition was brought, the petition was premature, and therefore, properly dismissed (see, People ex rel. Matthews v. New York State Div. of Parole, 95 N.Y.2d 640).

KRAUSMAN, J.P., S. MILLER, McGINITY and SCHMIDT, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Nunez v. New York State Parole Division

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 4, 2001
284 A.D.2d 333 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Nunez v. New York State Parole Division

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF EDUSIN NUNEZ, appellant, v. NEW YORK STATE PAROLE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 4, 2001

Citations

284 A.D.2d 333 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
725 N.Y.S.2d 883

Citing Cases

Coscia v. Town of Greenburgh

For example, in D & Z Holding Corp. v City of N.Y. Dept. of Fin. (179 A.D.2d 796), this Court found that the…

People v. Singh

Here, Singh has been in federal custody since the parole violation warrant was issued. Though he was…