From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Nicolle “RR”

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Feb 11, 1976
51 A.D.2d 823 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)

Opinion

February 11, 1976


Appeal from an order of the Otsego County Family Court, entered June 13, 1975, which adjudged the child a permanently neglected child pursuant to section 611 FCT of the Family Court Act and permanently terminated her parents' right to custody. On this appeal, only the mother of the child in question challenges the termination of her parental right to custody, the child's father having voluntarily signed a form surrendering his daughter for adoption. In seeking a reversal of the Family Court order, the mother does not dispute allegations that she neglected her child, but rather bases her entire case upon the alleged failure of the Otsego County Department of Social Services to make "diligent efforts to encourage and strengthen the parental relationship" between the child and her parents in accordance with the provisions of section 611 FCT of the Family Court Act. Upon our examination of the record we find that the order appealed from must be affirmed. The child was born on February 7, 1972 and, since June of that same year, appellant has absented herself from the State of New York and taken up residences in Florida, Massachusetts and Colorado. She has also exhibited no interest in the child except at times when the extension of the child's placement or a possible finding of permanent neglect was under consideration. By such conduct appellant has effectively thwarted any possible effort the local agency could have made to encourage and strengthen her relationship with her daughter. Moreover, even assuming that the local agency failed to make the required effort, the evidence is overwhelming that the best interests of the child would be served by the termination of appellant's right to custody, and, therefore, said termination should not be delayed merely to punish the local agency for its alleged dereliction of duty (cf. Matter of Ray A.M. [Sugarman], 48 A.D.2d 161). Order affirmed, without costs. Greenblott, J.P., Sweeney, Kane, Main and Reynolds, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In re Nicolle “RR”

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Feb 11, 1976
51 A.D.2d 823 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)
Case details for

In re Nicolle “RR”

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of NICOLLE "RR", a Child Alleged to Be a Permanently…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Feb 11, 1976

Citations

51 A.D.2d 823 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)

Citing Cases

Matter of Diana

In our opinion, the natural parents, who are not living together, failed to take adequate steps to plan for…