From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Nicholas

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 2, 1996
224 A.D.2d 974 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

February 2, 1996

Appeal from the Erie County Family Court, Mix, J.

Present — Denman, P.J., Lawton, Doerr, Balio and Boehm, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Family Court's determination placing respondent in the custody of the Commissioner of Social Services for structured supervision in a residential facility is fully supported by the record (see, Matter of Hasan R., 177 A.D.2d 817, 818). The contention of respondent that the order of disposition does not comply with Family Court Act § 754 (2) is without merit. The reasons for the disposition are fully set forth in the order (cf., Matter of Tynisah S., 201 A.D.2d 958).

We call attention to the fact that the County Attorney failed to submit an answering brief. That failure hardly comports with his responsibilities in these matters.


Summaries of

Matter of Nicholas

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 2, 1996
224 A.D.2d 974 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Matter of Nicholas

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of NICHOLAS T., Appellant. ERIE COUNTY PROBATION DEPARTMENT…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Feb 2, 1996

Citations

224 A.D.2d 974 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
638 N.Y.S.2d 572

Citing Cases

Matter of Joseph

The deposition of the complainant, together with respondent's statement, establish, "if true, every element…

In re Eric CC.

This appeal followed. We note that petitioner failed to comply with the appropriate timeframes for the filing…