From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of New York City Interborough Ry. v. Moynahan

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 21, 1912
99 N.E. 1110 (N.Y. 1912)

Opinion

Argued June 6, 1912

Decided June 21, 1912

Ralph Norton and James L. Quackenbush for appellant.

Archibald R. Watson, Corporation Counsel ( Curtis A. Peters and Frank P. Reilly), for respondent.


Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: CULLEN, Ch. J., GRAY, WERNER, WILLARD BARTLETT, HISCOCK, CHASE and COLLIN, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of New York City Interborough Ry. v. Moynahan

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 21, 1912
99 N.E. 1110 (N.Y. 1912)
Case details for

Matter of New York City Interborough Ry. v. Moynahan

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Application of the NEW YORK CITY INTERBOROUGH RAILWAY…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 21, 1912

Citations

99 N.E. 1110 (N.Y. 1912)
99 N.E. 1110

Citing Cases

N.Y. Railways Co. v. City of New York

In view of the purpose of the act it is clear that in considering deductions to be made by reason of other…