From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Nationwide Insurance Co. v. Lukas

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 20, 1999
264 A.D.2d 778 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

Submitted May 19, 1999

September 20, 1999

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to permanently stay the arbitration of a claim for underinsured motorist benefits, the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (DeMaro, J.), dated July 29, 1998, which granted the petition.

Fine Hummel, P.C., Huntington, N.Y. (Ralph A. Hummel of counsel), for appellant.

Robert Trestman, Plainview, N.Y., for respondent.

GUY JAMES MANGANO, P.J., FRED T. SANTUCCI, GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, ANITA R. FLORIO, HOWARD MILLER, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

On October 1, 1994, the appellant was injured in an automobile accident. On October 18, 1994, he informed his insurance carrier, the petitioner Nationwide Insurance Company (hereinafter Nationwide), of his claim for underinsurance coverage. The supplementary uninsured motorists endorsement contained in the policy issued to him by Nationwide specified that if he commenced a lawsuit against the tortfeasor, he must "immediately" forward a copy of the summons and complaint to it. Although the appellant commenced such a lawsuit on or about August 15, 1995, he did not timely forward copies of the summons and complaint. In early February 1998 Nationwide received confirmation that the lawsuit had been commenced. On February 24, 1998, Nationwide disclaimed coverage on the grounds that the appellant failed to comply with that provision, and that the appellant failed to comply with its request for authorizations to obtain relevant medical reports and records. The summons and complaint were not fowarded to Nationwide until March 1998.

The appellant then served a demand for arbitration under the supplementary uninsured motorists endorsement. Nationwide sought a permanent stay of arbitration on the ground that the appellant had failed to timely comply with the conditions precedent of that endorsement.

The Supreme Court properly granted the petition since Nationwide established that the appellant waited approximately 2 1/2 years after commencement of the underlying lawsuit before forwarding to it a copy of the summons and complaint and failed to adequately comply with the request for medical authorizations ( see, Lumbermens Mut. Cas. Co. v. Moyler, 211 A.D.2d 401; Shutter v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co., 205 A.D.2d 817; Preferred Mut. Ins. Co. v. Sullivan, 199 A.D.2d 719; Brown v. MVAIC, 33 A.D.2d 804).

We reject the appellant's contention that Nationwide waived its right to disclaim coverage by waiting over three years after it was first notified of the underinsurance claim. An insurance carrier must give written notice of disclaimer on the ground of late notice "as soon as is reasonably possible after it first learns of the accident or of grounds for disclaimer of liability" ( Matter of Firemen's Fund Ins. Co. of Newark v. Hopkins, 88 N.Y.2d 836, 837; Hartford Ins. Co. v. County of Nassau, 46 N.Y.2d 1028, 1029; see, Allstate Ins. Co. v. Gross, 27 N.Y.2d 263). Here, Nationwide gave written notice of disclaimer approximately 20 days after it possessed sufficient facts upon which to base its disclaimer on the ground that the appellant had commenced the underlying action without immediately forwarding a copy of the summons and complaint ( see, State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Clift, 249 A.D.2d 800).

MANGANO, P.J., SANTUCCI, KRAUSMAN, FLORIO, and H. MILLER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Nationwide Insurance Co. v. Lukas

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 20, 1999
264 A.D.2d 778 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Matter of Nationwide Insurance Co. v. Lukas

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF NATIONWIDE INSURANCE COMPANY, respondent, v. WALTER F…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Sep 20, 1999

Citations

264 A.D.2d 778 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
695 N.Y.S.2d 132

Citing Cases

Travelers Ins. Co. v. Volmar Constr. Co.

That AIU received notice of the occurrence shortly after it occurred, and became aware of the underlying…

State v. Titan Roofing, Inc.

In light of the steps taken by Continental, along with the relatively minor delay, Plaintiff fails to raise…