From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Nassau County Dept. of Social Serv

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 22, 1993
191 A.D.2d 634 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

March 22, 1993

Appeal from the Family Court, Nassau County (Decker, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

A child need not sustain a serious injury in order to justify a finding that he has been abused. It is sufficient to show that the child was subjected to a substantial risk of physical injury which would be likely to cause serious or protracted disfigurement, or protracted impairment of his physical or emotional health (see, Family Ct Act § 1012 [e] [ii]; Matter of C. Children, 183 A.D.2d 767, 768; Matter of Bruce L., 140 Misc.2d 757). The injuries sustained by the infant in this case would not ordinarily occur or exist except by reason of the acts or omissions of the person responsible for Joseph's care and, therefore, constitute prima facie evidence of child abuse (see, Family Ct Act § 1046; Matter of Marcelina F., 117 A.D.2d 803, 804; Matter of Cerda, 114 A.D.2d 795). Accordingly, the petitioner met its burden of establishing abuse and the burden then shifted to Joseph's grandmother to present a satisfactory explanation (see, Matter of Marcelina F., supra; Matter of Cerda, supra).

Joseph's grandmother failed to present a satisfactory explanation to rebut the petitioner's prima facie showing of abuse. The testimony of the grandmother's witnesses that Joseph is a very active child who frequently throws temper tantrums and runs into things, injuring himself, was rebutted by the testimony of a pediatrician who testified that, because of their large number and random location, Joseph's bruises were not consistent with having been caused by falling, or contact with blunt objects, or even with injuries which could be incurred during temper tantrums. In his opinion, they were not self-inflicted. Moreover, Joseph's foster mother testified that, although Joseph occasionally throws temper tantrums, she has never seen him injure himself during one.

In view of the foregoing, we are satisfied that the finding of abuse was supported by a fair preponderance of the credible evidence (see, Family Ct Act § 1046 [b]; Matter of Joey T., 185 A.D.2d 851). Bracken, J.P., Lawrence, Copertino and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Nassau County Dept. of Social Serv

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 22, 1993
191 A.D.2d 634 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

Matter of Nassau County Dept. of Social Serv

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of NASSAU COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, on Behalf of…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 22, 1993

Citations

191 A.D.2d 634 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
595 N.Y.S.2d 234

Citing Cases

Admin. for Children's Servs. v. Ferida B. (In re Jonah B.)

Although the definition of "abuse" under Family Court Act § 1012 is similar to the definition of "serious…

Matter of Nassau County Dept. of Social Servs

Decided July 6, 1993 Appeal from (2d Dept: 191 A.D.2d 634) MOTIONS FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL GRANTED OR…