From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Naklicki v. St. Charles Hospital

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Feb 22, 1996
224 A.D.2d 850 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

February 22, 1996

Appeal from the Workers' Compensation Board.


Claimant, a registered nurse, injured her neck while lifting a patient and was awarded workers' compensation benefits. Thereafter, although claimant did not resume nursing duties, she did obtain part-time employment at a medical laboratory. As a result, her case was reopened to determine, inter alia, the effect of her postemployment earnings on her award. The Board found, inter alia, that claimant was entitled to the continuation of benefits at a reduced rate notwithstanding her failure to disclose her postemployment earnings. Claimant's self-insured employer challenges this decision and argues that claimant's intentional misrepresentation of her postemployment work activities renders her ineligible to receive benefits under Workers' Compensation Law § 114.

We disagree. We find no reason to depart from Matter of Gillyard v. Spenyovics ( 27 A.D.2d 765), in which we held that Workers' Compensation Law § 114 does not render an otherwise eligible claimant ineligible to receive benefits because such claimant made false representations concerning postemployment earnings. Since the Legislature has not seen fit to amend this statute to specifically provide for forfeiture of future benefits in circumstances like those presented here, we decline to disturb the Board's decision.

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Casey, Yesawich Jr. and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

Matter of Naklicki v. St. Charles Hospital

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Feb 22, 1996
224 A.D.2d 850 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Matter of Naklicki v. St. Charles Hospital

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of CATHY NAKLICKI, Respondent, v. ST. CHARLES…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Feb 22, 1996

Citations

224 A.D.2d 850 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
638 N.Y.S.2d 200

Citing Cases

Matter of Claim of Phelps v. Phelps

Under these circumstances, we are satisfied that there is substantial evidence to support the Board's factual…

Claim of Machado v. Pleasantville Ford, Inc.

To the extent that claimant asserted before the Board that he did not know that his activities constituted…