From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Munsie v. Fiore

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 8, 1963
19 A.D.2d 916 (N.Y. App. Div. 1963)

Opinion

November 8, 1963


Upon remittal after a prior appeal ( 9 A.D.2d 806), the board, after additional hearings, made an award upon finding that death resulted from delirium tremens, precipitated by the trauma of the conceded industrial accident. Although another trier of the facts might have denied credence to the testimony of the claimant widow as to decedent's hallucinations or delusions, the board chose to accept it and we find no legal basis upon which it could be rejected here; and we cannot account as less than substantial either the claimant widow's testimony or that of her medical expert which was in part predicated upon it. The board was warranted in finding that the accidental death was not due solely to intoxication even though, contrary to the board's conclusion, it may have been a contributing factor. (Cf. Matter of Swanson v. Williams Co., 278 App. Div. 477, affd. 304 N.Y. 624.) Appellants' procedural objection is rendered academic by the concession in the board's brief. Decision affirmed, with costs to the Workmen's Compensation Board. Bergan, P.J., Gibson, Reynolds and Taylor, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Munsie v. Fiore

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 8, 1963
19 A.D.2d 916 (N.Y. App. Div. 1963)
Case details for

Matter of Munsie v. Fiore

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of DOROTHY MUNSIE, Respondent, v. BEN DI FIORE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Nov 8, 1963

Citations

19 A.D.2d 916 (N.Y. App. Div. 1963)

Citing Cases

Hemphill Drug Company v. Mann

The New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division, affirmed the decision of the lower court in awarding…