Opinion
July 6, 1978
Appeal from a decision of the Workers' Compensation Board, filed October 7, 1976, which held that the claimant had not sustained an occupational disease. The sole issue before the board was whether or not there was a causal connection between the contact dermatitis and/or chemical burn sustained by the claimant in the course of his employment and the present disability of mycosis fungoides, a form of cancer. The board found, as follows: "Dr. Joseph J. Eller, the designated specialist, reported that the disease which the claimant now has is not related to the dermatitis caused by the weed killer with which the claimant was in contact on March 28, 1972 and that this case of mycosis fungoides is not causally related to the claimant's occupational disease. He testified that he has not come across a case where mycosis fungoides was caused by a weed killer or any other outside irritation inflammation. After review of the probative medical evidence, the Board finds that the claimant did not contract an occupational disease within the meaning of the law and that claimant's mycosis fungoides is not causally related to his employment." The claimant contends upon this appeal that even though Dr. Eller unequivocally denied causal relationship upon the facts in this case, the doctor on cross-examination agreed with such key portions of testimony by other doctors as to "logically" be in favor of causal connection. However, conflicts in medical testimony create issues of fact for the board and its resolution of such issues is binding (Matter of Carrasquillo v Santini Bros. — The Original, 13 N.Y.2d 245, 248, 249; Matter of Ernest v Boggs Lake Estates, 12 N.Y.2d 414; Matter of Palermo v Gallucci Sons, 5 N.Y.2d 529, 532, 533). Upon the present record there is substantial evidence to support the decision. Decision affirmed, without costs. Greenblott, J.P., Staley, Jr., Main, Mikoll and Herlihy, JJ., concur.