From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Morrissey v. Morrissey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 25, 1996
225 A.D.2d 779 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

March 25, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Burke, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the appellants' cross motion requesting photocopies of the forensic reports or permission to copy these reports by hand since the court permitted counsel to review the reports in chambers ( see, Matter of Scuderi-Forzano v Forzano, 213 A.D.2d 652). Rosenblatt, J.P., Sullivan, Copertino, Santucci and Goldstein, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Morrissey v. Morrissey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 25, 1996
225 A.D.2d 779 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Matter of Morrissey v. Morrissey

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of PATRICIA MORRISSEY et al., Appellants, v. CARON MORRISSEY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 25, 1996

Citations

225 A.D.2d 779 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
639 N.Y.S.2d 953

Citing Cases

Raymond v. Raymond

The Family Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the request of the father, who…

Of v. Amanda Q.

However, the absence of a dismissal remedy for a custodial parent's non-compliance with Family Court Act…