From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Monroe County Department of Social Services v. Walker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 26, 1991
178 A.D.2d 1012 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

December 26, 1991

Appeal from the Monroe County Family Court, Maas, J.

Present — Doerr, J.P., Boomer, Green, Pine and Balio, JJ.


Order insofar as appealed from unanimously reversed on the law without costs and matter remitted to Monroe County Family Court for further proceedings, in accordance with the following Memorandum: The Department of Social Services appeals from that portion of an order of Family Court which confirmed the finding of the Hearing Examiner reducing an income execution order (IEO) based upon respondent's changed financial condition. The Department argues that the Hearing Examiner had no authority to modify the IEO. We agree. The Hearing Examiner should have declined to modify the IEO and instead should have referred the matter to the appropriate Support Collection Unit (see, CPLR 5241 [e]). Upon an adverse determination by the Collection Unit, a party may seek review in a CPLR article 78 proceeding (see, Matter of Commissioner of Social Servs. v Sealy, 139 Misc.2d 563). Accordingly, the original IEO is reinstated.


Summaries of

Monroe County Department of Social Services v. Walker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 26, 1991
178 A.D.2d 1012 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

Monroe County Department of Social Services v. Walker

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of MONROE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, on Behalf of…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 26, 1991

Citations

178 A.D.2d 1012 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
578 N.Y.S.2d 767

Citing Cases

Martinez v. New York City Support Collection Enforcement Unit

It is well established in New York that "[u]pon an adverse determination by the Collection Unit, a party may…

In re City of New York

On appeal from these orders, petitioner objects to the court's imposition of a schedule for the payment of…