From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Monique

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 7, 1997
236 A.D.2d 880 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

February 7, 1997.

Order unanimously affirmed without costs.

Present — Pine, J.P., Lawton, Doerr, Boehm and Fallon, JJ.


We reject the argument that petitioner failed to prove by clear and convincing evidence that respondent is not capable of caring for her children now or in the foreseeable future by reason of mental disease ( cf., Matter of Shaneek Christal W., 122 AD2d 215, 216). The court-appointed psychiatrist testified that respondent had been hospitalized for mental illness in the past and was diagnosed as suffering from schizophrenia; that she continues to demonstrate symptoms of that disease, which is now in remission; that she lacks insight into the disease; and that she refuses to take the medications prescribed for her psychiatric condition. Respondent's mother testified that respondent continues to manifest bizarr e behavior. That testimony is sufficient to support the determination ( see, Matter of Naticia Q., 226 AD2d 755; Matter of Bryant S., 188 AD2d 1078; Matter of Demetrius F., 176 AD2d 940). (Appeal from Order of Erie County Family Court, Townsend, J. — Neglect.)


Summaries of

Matter of Monique

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 7, 1997
236 A.D.2d 880 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Matter of Monique

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of LONETTE MONIQUE C. and Others, Children Alleged to be…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Feb 7, 1997

Citations

236 A.D.2d 880 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
653 N.Y.S.2d 760

Citing Cases

Matter of Loraida G.

Essentially, respondent has the opportunity to show that she can continue to exercise good judgment in regard…

Matter of Loraida G

See e.g. In the Matter of Heather E., 238 A.D.2d 678, 656 N.Y.S.2d 410 (3rd Dep't 1997) andIn the Matter of…