From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Mokski v. Bethlehem Steel Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 16, 1951
278 App. Div. 624 (N.Y. App. Div. 1951)

Opinion

January 16, 1951.

Appeal from Workmen's Compensation Board.

Present — Foster, P.J., Heffernan, Brewster, Bergan and Coon, JJ.


Claimant was employed as a machinist-repairer by the employer at Lackawanna, New York. On September 10, 1947, he sustained accidental injuries in the nature of a sprain and strain of the lower back from lifting a heavy jack and wood block. As a result he was totally disabled from September 11, 1947, to December 9, 1947, for which period he was awarded total disability compensation which was paid by appellant without objection. Claimant returned to work on December 9, 1947, when he was assigned to lighter duties because of his injuries. During the year prior to his accident claimant had worked sometimes six and sometimes seven days per week for a period of at least twenty weeks. The board found that during the year prior to the accident, claimant had worked a total of 284 days. The board further held that claimant was a six-day worker and fixed his compensation pursuant to the provisions of subdivision 1 of section 14 Work. Comp. of the Workmen's Compensation Law. The board also found that due to the accidental injuries the wage earning capacity of the claimant was reduced so as to entitle him to a compensation rate of $5.77 per week during the period of partial disability from December 15, 1947, to July 18, 1948. The evidence sustains the findings. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the Workmen's Compensation Board.


Summaries of

Matter of Mokski v. Bethlehem Steel Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 16, 1951
278 App. Div. 624 (N.Y. App. Div. 1951)
Case details for

Matter of Mokski v. Bethlehem Steel Company

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of EDWARD MOKSKI, Respondent, against BETHLEHEM…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jan 16, 1951

Citations

278 App. Div. 624 (N.Y. App. Div. 1951)

Citing Cases

Matter of Smith v. Casey

Faced with this situation a majority of the board determined that subdivision 1 should be disregarded and…