From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Moczulski

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 1, 1990
167 A.D.2d 578 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

November 1, 1990

Appeal from the Surrogate's Court of Albany County (Marinelli, S.).


Since respondent had already been granted several adjournments of his trial, including one for receipt of a handwriting expert's report and another to retain new counsel, Surrogate's Court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the objections and granting probate of the will in question (see, Scarola v. St. Vincent's Med. Center, 154 A.D.2d 364; Matter of Alario v. DeMarco, 149 A.D.2d 587, appeal dismissed 74 N.Y.2d 791). That respondent's rights to proceed were diligently protected by the court are evidenced in the fact that the court stayed its final order for seven days to allow respondent one final opportunity to proceed to trial. However, at the end of that time he was still not prepared to go forward.

Order and decree affirmed, without costs. Kane, J.P., Weiss, Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., and Mercure, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Moczulski

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 1, 1990
167 A.D.2d 578 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

Matter of Moczulski

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Estate of JOSEPH MOCZULSKI, Deceased. JOANNE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Nov 1, 1990

Citations

167 A.D.2d 578 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
562 N.Y.S.2d 842

Citing Cases

Matter of the Estate of Young

This Court granted a motion to appoint a new guardian ad litem to replace of the original guardian ad litem…

In re Curtis

ORDERED that the decree is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs. The determination to dismiss…