From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Mitchell v. Phillips

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 6, 2000
268 A.D.2d 633 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

January 6, 2000

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain disciplinary rules.

Paul Mitchell, Dannemora, petitioner in person.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney-General (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), Albany, for respondent.

Before: CARDONA, P.J., MERCURE, CREW III, PETERS and MUGGLIN, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

Petitioner, a prison inmate, challenges the determination finding him guilty of smuggling and violating facility correspondence procedures. The charges stemmed from an investigation conducted by a correction officer who discovered that petitioner was sending mail containing money to a third party and then having it sent on to another inmate. Petitioner's claim that the misbehavior report erroneously stated the wrong date is without merit. Because the misbehavior report contained adequate detail to provide petitioner with notice of the charge against him, we conclude that the minor date discrepancy was a harmless technical defect (see, Matter of Alvarado v. Goord, 252 A.D.2d 650). Finally, the misbehavior report, documentary evidence and hearing testimony, combined with the inferences that can be drawn therefrom (see, Matter of Phillips v. Goord, 252 A.D.2d 642), provide substantial evidence of petitioner's guilt (see, Matter of Rivera v. Coombe, 231 A.D.2d 790).

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Crew III, Peters and Mugglin, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Matter of Mitchell v. Phillips

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 6, 2000
268 A.D.2d 633 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Matter of Mitchell v. Phillips

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of PAUL MITCHELL, Petitioner, v. MICHAEL PHILLIPS, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jan 6, 2000

Citations

268 A.D.2d 633 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
700 N.Y.S.2d 597

Citing Cases

Matter of Lashway v. Kuhlmann

Whatever minor errors may have existed in the misbehavior report were insufficient to establish that the…

Matter of Delgado v. Hurlburt

Our review of the detailed misbehavior report, together with the testimony of the correction officer who…