From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Mikolinski v. Farnsworth

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 29, 1998
249 A.D.2d 956 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

April 29, 1998

(Appeal from Amended Order of Oswego County Family Court, McCarthy, J. — Custody.)

Present — Pine, J.P., Hayes, Wisner, Pigott, Jr., and Boehm, JJ.


Amended order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Family Court did not abuse its discretion in modifying a prior custody order by awarding petitioner father custody of the parties' infant son. We give due deference to the factual findings of Family Court, which had the opportunity to observe the witnesses and assess their credibility, and its determination will not be disturbed where, as here, it has a sound and substantial basis in the record ( see, Eschbach v. Eschbach, 56 N.Y.2d 167, 173-174; Matter of De Losh v. De Losh, 235 A.D.2d 851, 853, lv denied 89 N.Y.2d 813). The contention of respondent that she was denied effective assistance of counsel lacks merit ( see generally, People v. Satterfield, 66 N.Y.2d 796, 798-800; People v. Baldi, 54 N.Y.2d 137, 147).


Summaries of

Matter of Mikolinski v. Farnsworth

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 29, 1998
249 A.D.2d 956 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Matter of Mikolinski v. Farnsworth

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JOSEPH MIKOLINSKI, SR., Respondent, v. BARBARA…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Apr 29, 1998

Citations

249 A.D.2d 956 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
671 N.Y.S.2d 389

Citing Cases

Procopio v. Procopio

We reject the mother's contention that the court abused its discretion in relying on the testimony of the…

Matter of Tania W. v. Richard B

The court found that the father was "more fit" than petitioner mother to care for the parties' five-year-old…