From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Meyer v. Humaydan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 11, 1983
96 A.D.2d 743 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)

Opinion

July 11, 1983

Appeal from the Monroe County Family Court, Corbett, J.

Present — Hancock, Jr., J.P., Denman, Boomer, Green and Schnepp, JJ.


Order unanimously reversed, with costs, motion denied and petitioner's petition reinstated. Memorandum: Family Court erred in vacating its prior approval of an agreement in which respondent admitted paternity and agreed to pay child support. Since petitioner and her child resided in Fargo, North Dakota, at the time the approval was requested, the notice requirement of subdivision (b) of section 516 FCT of the Family Court Act has no extraterritorial effect (see McKinney's Cons Laws of NY, Book 1, Statutes, § 149).


Summaries of

Matter of Meyer v. Humaydan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 11, 1983
96 A.D.2d 743 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)
Case details for

Matter of Meyer v. Humaydan

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of MARY E. MEYER, Appellant, v. HASIB HUMAYDAN, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jul 11, 1983

Citations

96 A.D.2d 743 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)

Citing Cases

Motor Vehicle Ass'n of U.S. v. Abrams

Generally, the laws of one state can have no force or effect within the territorial limits of another,…