From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Messineo v. Messineo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 13, 1993
196 A.D.2d 826 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

September 13, 1993

Appeal from the Family Court, Suffolk County (Freundlich, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The former husband failed to present sufficient evidence that the former wife was holding herself out as another man's wife (see, Matter of Bliss v Bliss, 66 N.Y.2d 382). Absent such a showing, courts have no power under Domestic Relations Law § 248 to modify or annul a support obligation.

Because there is no indication in the record that the former wife intentionally relinquished the right to receive alimony (see, Andrews v Dolan, 158 A.D.2d 569), we reject the former husband's claim that she waived her right in this regard.

We have reviewed the former husband's remaining contentions and conclude that they are without merit. Mangano, P.J., Rosenblatt, Lawrence, Copertino and Joy, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Messineo v. Messineo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 13, 1993
196 A.D.2d 826 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

Matter of Messineo v. Messineo

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of CARMELA MESSINEO, Respondent, v. FRANK MESSINEO, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Sep 13, 1993

Citations

196 A.D.2d 826 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
602 N.Y.S.2d 25

Citing Cases

S.P. v. M.P.

Accordingly, his application to terminate his maintenance obligation must be denied. See Messineo v. Messineo…

Graev v. Lawrence

For example, the Court of Appeals has rejected a husband's application to terminate his maintenance…