From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Merola

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 22, 1987
131 A.D.2d 58 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Opinion

October 22, 1987

Michael D. Sarner of counsel (Michael A. Gentile, attorney), for petitioner.

Mordkofsky Goldstein, P.C., for respondent.


Respondent Michael Peter Merola was admitted to practice law by the Second Department on August 3, 1983.

Respondent pleaded guilty to attempted grand larceny in the third degree, a class E felony (Penal Law § 110.00, 155.35 Penal) in Supreme Court, Bronx County, on June 16, 1987.

The Departmental Disciplinary Committee has moved for an order, pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (b), striking respondent's name from the roll of attorneys, upon the ground that respondent ceased to be an attorney and counselor-at-law upon his conviction of a felony. The Departmental Disciplinary Committee notes that Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (a) requires that respondent be automatically disbarred upon his entry of a plea of guilty to a felony (see also, Matter of Cohen, 107 A.D.2d 189 [1st Dept 1985]; Matter of Swirsky, 103 A.D.2d 195 [1st Dept 1984]). Respondent opposes the application, requesting that he be granted leave to resign pursuant to 22 NYCRR 603.11.

Respondent's resignation cannot be accepted at this time since his disbarment was automatic and effective upon his conviction (Matter of Phillips, 100 A.D.2d 69 [1st Dept 1984]).

Accordingly, the application should be granted and respondent's name stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law.

MURPHY, P.J., ROSS, ASCH, ROSENBERGER and SMITH, JJ., concur.

Respondent's name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law in the State of New York, effective October 22, 1987.


Summaries of

Matter of Merola

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 22, 1987
131 A.D.2d 58 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)
Case details for

Matter of Merola

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of MICHAEL PETER MEROLA, an Attorney, Respondent…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 22, 1987

Citations

131 A.D.2d 58 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)
520 N.Y.S.2d 149

Citing Cases

Matter of Kourland

When the Federal Judge at plea asked respondent whether she had "lost [her] right to practice law in New…

In the Matter of Stark

Further, respondent freely acknowledges he cannot defend himself against the pending disciplinary proceeding…