From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Meehan v. Nassau Community College

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 4, 1998
251 A.D.2d 415 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

June 4, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Burke, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

An arbitration award may not be vacated unless it is irrational, violates a strong public policy, or clearly exceeds a limitation imposed on the arbitrator as set forth in CPLR 7511 (b) ( see, Matter of Board of Educ. v. Arlington Teachers Assn., 78 N.Y.2d 33, 37). An arbitrator exceeds his or her power under CPLR 7511 (b) (1) (iii) if the award gives a "completely irrational construction to the provisions in dispute and, in effect, made a new contract for the parties" ( Matter of National Cash Register Co. [Wilson], 8 N.Y.2d 377, 383; see also, Rochester City School Dist. v. Rochester Teachers Assn., 41 N.Y.2d 578, 582). Contrary to the contention of the appellant Nassau Community College (hereinafter the college), the interpretation by the arbitration panel here of Article 14 of the parties' collective bargaining agreement was not irrational. Accordingly, the award was not in excess of the power of the arbitration panel.

The award here is also not violative of public policy. Public policy may not be invoked in every instance where arbitration of a collective bargaining agreement threatens to encroach on the management prerogatives of a State-financed college ( see, Matter of Wyandanch Union Free School Dist. v. Wyandanch Teachers Assn., 48 N.Y.2d 669, 670). Rather, public policy may be invoked only where an arbitration award interferes with a college's obligation to maintain academic standards in the classroom ( see, Matter of Board of Educ. v. Arlington Teachers Assn., 78 N.Y.2d 33, 37, supra; Honeoye Falls-Lima Cent. School Dist. v. Honeoye Falls-Lima Educ. Assn., 49 N.Y.2d 732, 734). That is not the case here. Here, the arbitration award merely gave effect to the provision in the parties' collective bargaining agreement which obligated the college to designate the courses offered during the "mini-semester" for assignment to its qualified adjunct faculty. Although the award subjects the college to competing obligations since it conflicts with the college's obligation to the full-time faculty under a separate collective bargaining agreement, the dilemma is of the college's own making and will not serve as a basis for vacating the award ( see generally, Grace Co. v. Rubber Workers, 461 U.S. 757).

Bracken, J.P., Pizzuto, Friedmann and McGinity, J.J., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Meehan v. Nassau Community College

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 4, 1998
251 A.D.2d 415 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Matter of Meehan v. Nassau Community College

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JOHN T. MEEHAN, Respondent, v. NASSAU COMMUNITY COLLEGE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 4, 1998

Citations

251 A.D.2d 415 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
674 N.Y.S.2d 697

Citing Cases

Sheehan v. Suffolk Cnty. Sheriff's Dep't

The grounds are (1) that the rights of a party were prej udiced by corruption, fraud or misconduct in…

Nassau Cmty. Coll. v. Loiacono

The arbitrator's decision was consistent with the overwhelming weight of decisional authority. See Meehan v…