From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of McQuade v. Heffernan

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Aug 18, 1950
94 N.E.2d 253 (N.Y. 1950)

Summary

In McQuade v Heffernan (301 N.Y. 665, 666), the lead candidate was disqualified for nonresidence and the designating petition was only "declared invalid as to him" and not as to the other candidates on the same petition.

Summary of this case from Matter of Fotopoulos v. Bd. of Elections

Opinion

Argued August 18, 1950

Decided August 18, 1950

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, POWERS, J.

Max M. Bernstein and Sidney Squire for appellants.

Charles Kleinberg and Jule L. Maisel, in person, respondents.

John P. McGrath, Corporation Counsel ( Beatrice Dunn of counsel), for Board of Elections of the City of New York, respondent.


Order affirmed; no opinion.

Concur: LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND, FULD and FROESSEL, JJ. Taking no part: DYE, J.


Summaries of

Matter of McQuade v. Heffernan

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Aug 18, 1950
94 N.E.2d 253 (N.Y. 1950)

In McQuade v Heffernan (301 N.Y. 665, 666), the lead candidate was disqualified for nonresidence and the designating petition was only "declared invalid as to him" and not as to the other candidates on the same petition.

Summary of this case from Matter of Fotopoulos v. Bd. of Elections
Case details for

Matter of McQuade v. Heffernan

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JOHN H. McQUADE et al., Appellants, against WILLIAM J…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Aug 18, 1950

Citations

94 N.E.2d 253 (N.Y. 1950)
94 N.E.2d 253

Citing Cases

Matter of Fotopoulos v. Bd. of Elections

And it is, in principle, inconsistent with the rule that where as often happens there are several candidates…

Matter of Berbary v. Moss

All that is required is the signature of the witness. In any event, there is no proof in the record that the…