From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of McCarthy v. McGoldrick

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 24, 1935
194 N.E. 406 (N.Y. 1935)

Opinion

Argued January 4, 1935

Decided January 24, 1935

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

Paul Windels, Corporation Counsel ( Paxton Blair and Edmund L. Palmieri of counsel), for appellant.

Alfred J. Talley and Edmund J. Delany for respondent.


By a written instrument dated March 1, 1933, petitioner, for a consideration, agreed that he waived the salary of deputy chief of the fire department of the city of New York during the emergency declared to exist by chapter 637 of the Laws of 1932, and that he accepted pay at the lower rate of a battalion chief's salary, "said rate of pay to continue during the period of the emergency or unless and until the Board of Estimate and Apportionment shall provide otherwise." It was not until October 30, 1933, that the Board of Estimate and Apportionment provided otherwise, but, in this proceeding, petitioner has recovered the difference between the salaries of the two ranks from March 1, 1933, to October 31, 1933. We think that this result is contrary to the terms and intent of the waiver which was executed by petitioner as an inducement to his appointment to the rank of deputy chief.

The orders should be reversed, with costs in all courts, and the motion denied.

CRANE, Ch. J., LEHMAN, O'BRIEN, HUBBS, CROUCH and LOUGHRAN, JJ., concur; FINCH, J., not sitting.

Orders reversed, etc.


Summaries of

Matter of McCarthy v. McGoldrick

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 24, 1935
194 N.E. 406 (N.Y. 1935)
Case details for

Matter of McCarthy v. McGoldrick

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JOHN J. McCARTHY, Respondent, against JOSEPH D…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jan 24, 1935

Citations

194 N.E. 406 (N.Y. 1935)
194 N.E. 406

Citing Cases

State ex Rel. Rothrum v. Darby

v. University City, 8 S.W.2d 73; State ex rel. v. Neosho, 203 Mo. 40; State ex rel. v. Gordon, 251 Mo. 303.…

Rowland v. Kammerer

These provisions reflect the common-law rule that compensation payable for public service cannot be waived (…