From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Mark

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jun 8, 1993
624 A.2d 1368 (N.J. 1993)

Summary

imposing three-month suspension for oral and written misrepresentations to court and adversary

Summary of this case from Matter of Forrest

Opinion

June 8, 1993.


ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed a report with the Court recommending that MICHAEL A. MARK of HACKENSACK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1986, be suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months for oral and written misrepresentations to a court and to his adversary in litigation, in violation of RPC 3.3, RPC 3.4, RPC 8.4(c) and (d), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the report and recommendation of the Disciplinary Review Board are hereby adopted and MICHAEL A. MARK of HACKENSACK is suspended from practice for a period of three months, effective June 28, 1993, and until the further Order of the Court; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED the respondent shall be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of his suspension and that he shall comply with Regulation 23 of the Administrative Guidelines Governing Suspended Attorneys; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent shall reimburse the Ethics Financial Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.


Summaries of

Matter of Mark

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jun 8, 1993
624 A.2d 1368 (N.J. 1993)

imposing three-month suspension for oral and written misrepresentations to court and adversary

Summary of this case from Matter of Forrest
Case details for

Matter of Mark

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF MICHAEL A. MARK, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Jun 8, 1993

Citations

624 A.2d 1368 (N.J. 1993)
624 A.2d 1368

Citing Cases

Matter of Forrest

Id. at 363, 571 A.2d 1282; cf. In re Mark, 132 N.J. 268, 624 A.2d 1368 (1993) (imposing three-month…

In re Stolz

tor who failed to disclose to the court that a police officer whose testimony was critical to the prosecution…