From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Luria v. Conklin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 18, 1988
139 A.D.2d 650 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Opinion

April 18, 1988

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Edelstein, J.).


Ordered that the appeals by George J. Conklin, Jr., and Herbert Reisman, from the order dated April 24, 1986, are dismissed as abandoned; and it is further,

Ordered that the appeal from the order dated May 22, 1986 is dismissed as abandoned; and it is further,

Ordered that the appeal from the judgment dated April 24, 1986, is dismissed, as it was superseded by the order dated May 22, 1986 made upon reargument; and it is further,

Ordered that the order dated May 22, 1986 is affirmed insofar as reviewed; and it is further,

Ordered that the petitioners are awarded one bill of costs.

The petition for incorporation was legally insufficient in that it did not include a complete list of the regular inhabitants of the territory in accordance with the clear statutory mandate (see, Village Law § 2-202 [c] [2]; Matter of Village of Viola Hills [Lempert — Conklin], 129 A.D.2d 579, lv denied 70 N.Y.2d 602).

Moreover the former Supervisor of the Town of Ramapo was precluded from approving the petition because it consisted of territories which were part of other incorporation petitions then in the appellate process. The Supervisor should have waited until the appellate process was complete in order to avoid the possibly undesired result of one piece of property being part of two different incorporated villages in contravention of the statutory mandate (see, Village Law § 2-200; § 2-208 [3]). Bracken, J.P., Brown, Weinstein and Spatt, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Luria v. Conklin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 18, 1988
139 A.D.2d 650 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)
Case details for

Matter of Luria v. Conklin

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JOSEPH LURIA et al., Respondents-Appellants, v. GEORGE J…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 18, 1988

Citations

139 A.D.2d 650 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Citing Cases

Defreestville Area v. Tazbir

Pursuant to Village Law § 2-200 (1) and § 2-206 (1) (d), a proposed village territory may not include "part…

Commandeer Realty Assocs., Inc. v. Allegro

Even a minuscule overlap in the territory proposed for annexation could render the first proceeding academic,…