From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Lunney v. Selsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 14, 2000
275 A.D.2d 820 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

September 14, 2000.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

George Lunney, Comstock, petitioner in person.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney-General (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), Albany, for respondent.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Carpinello, Mugglin and Rose, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rules that prohibit inmates from possessing a weapon, fighting, assault and refusing a direct order. This determination was affirmed upon petitioner's administrative appeal. Petitioner thereafter commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding and we confirm.

Contrary to petitioner's contention, we find that the misbehavior report, combined with the hearing testimony, including the reporting officer's testimony as to her eyewitness observations, provide substantial evidence of petitioner's guilt (see, Matter of Foster v. Coughlin, 76 N.Y.2d 964, 966). Although petitioner claimed that he was not the initial aggressor in the fight and denied possessing the weapon and refusing a direct order, this raised a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see, Matter of De La Rosa v. Portuondo, 247 A.D.2d 810, 811).

Petitioner's remaining arguments have been examined and found to be unpersuasive.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Matter of Lunney v. Selsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 14, 2000
275 A.D.2d 820 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Matter of Lunney v. Selsky

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of GEORGE LUNNEY, Petitioner, v. DONALD SELSKY, as Director…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Sep 14, 2000

Citations

275 A.D.2d 820 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
713 N.Y.S.2d 300

Citing Cases

Sanchez v. Goord

A razor-type weapon, later found on the ground where the fight took place, was admitted in evidence at…

Rodriguez v. Selsky

Petitioner was taken to the infirmary where he was found to have sustained abrasions on his head and body and…