From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lugo v. Coombe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 19, 1997
240 A.D.2d 878 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

June 19, 1997


Following a tier III disciplinary hearing petitioner, a prison inmate, was found guilty of committing arson by setting fire to his mattress and later extinguishing it. Upon denial of his administrative appeal, petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking to annul the determination.

Initially, we reject petitioner's contention that he received inadequate employee assistance. During the course of the disciplinary hearing, petitioner acknowledged that he had received all of the requested documentary evidence and, as such, any objection in this regard has been waived (see generally, Matter of Abif v. Stinson, 231 A.D.2d 804, 805). Moreover, even assuming that this issue was properly before us, we would find petitioner's argument to be lacking in merit, as he failed to demonstrate that any prejudice resulted from the alleged deficiencies in the assistance that he received (see, Matter of Ventimiglia v. Coombe, 233 A.D.2d 610, 611).

Similarly unavailing is petitioner's claim that the misbehavior report was defective. Assuming, without deciding, that this issue has been preserved for our review (see generally, Matter of Rodriguez v. Coughlin, 190 A.D.2d 919, 920 [failure to raise issue at hearing constitutes waiver]), the alleged defect with respect to the time of the fire did not deprive petitioner of notice of the charge against him or of the opportunity to prepare a defense (see generally, Matter of Torres v. Coombe, 234 A.D.2d 710).

Finally, we find no merit to petitioner's assertion that the Hearing Officer was biased, as our review of the record reveals that the hearing was conducted in a fair and impartial manner. Petitioner's remaining contentions, including his assertion that the intermittent gaps in the hearing transcript and the Hearing Officer's denial of his request to call a particular witness mandate annulment, have been examined and found to be lacking in merit.

Mikoll, J.P., White, Yesawich Jr. and Peters, JJ., concur.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Lugo v. Coombe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 19, 1997
240 A.D.2d 878 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Lugo v. Coombe

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of CARLOS LUGO, Petitioner, v. PHILIP J. COOMBE, JR., as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jun 19, 1997

Citations

240 A.D.2d 878 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
659 N.Y.S.2d 795

Citing Cases

Matter of Smith v. Senkowski

Finally, contrary to petitioner's claim, we do not find that Hearing Officer bias is established by the fact…

Matter of Ragland v. Great Meadow Corr. Fac

A determination following a disciplinary hearing finding petitioner guilty of both charges was affirmed on…