From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lugo v. City of Newburgh

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 7, 1994
209 A.D.2d 414 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

November 7, 1994

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs.


On November 21, 1989, the petitioner was found guilty of 12 specifications of misconduct and dismissed from his position as a City of Newburgh police officer. In reaching his determination that dismissal was appropriate, the City Manager considered allegations that the petitioner's attendance record was poor, and that he had abused his sick leave privileges. Upon review of the 1989 determination, the Appellate Division, Third Department, held that the findings of misconduct were supported by substantial evidence, but annulled the imposition of the penalty of dismissal in order to afford the petitioner an opportunity to respond in writing to the allegations regarding his attendance record and use of sick leave (Matter of Lugo v. Damiano, 178 A.D.2d 827). On July 20, 1992, after considering the petitioner's written response, the City Manager again imposed the penalty of termination of employment, nunc pro tunc, as of the date of the original determination.

Contrary to the petitioner's contention, we find that the penalty of dismissal was not "so disproportionate to the offense, in light of all the circumstances, as to be shocking to one's sense of fairness" (Matter of Pell v. Board of Educ., 34 N.Y.2d 222, 233). In this regard, we note that although the petitioner was notified on 20 separate occasions that he was prohibited from performing outside work because of his excessive use of sick days, he nevertheless admittedly engaged in outside employment, both before and after his suspension, without receiving permission to do so (see, Matter of Lugo v. Damiano, 178 A.D.2d 827, supra; see also, Miller v. Sise, 120 A.D.2d 653).

Furthermore, since the matter was remitted solely for a redetermination of the penalty, and the penalty was not reduced, the petitioner is not entitled to an award of back pay (see, Matter of De Martino v. Meehan, 149 A.D.2d 703, 704; Matter of Cromwell v. Bates, 117 A.D.2d 667, 668). Bracken, J.P., Santucci, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Lugo v. City of Newburgh

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 7, 1994
209 A.D.2d 414 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Lugo v. City of Newburgh

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of WILLIAM LUGO, Petitioner, v. CITY OF NEWBURGH et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 7, 1994

Citations

209 A.D.2d 414 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
618 N.Y.S.2d 420

Citing Cases

Hershkowitz v. New York

Thereafter, plaintiff commenced this action to recover back pay and benefits for the period of time between…