From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Claim of Luftig v. Stevenson Pie Co.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Sep 29, 1966
221 N.E.2d 171 (N.Y. 1966)

Opinion

Argued September 20, 1966

Decided September 29, 1966

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department.

Powell Cooper and Allen Redlich for appellants.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General ( Jorge L. Gomez, Ruth Kessler Toch and Daniel Polansky of counsel), for Workmen's Compensation Board, respondent.

No appearance for claimant-respondent.


Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges FULD, BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN and KEATING. Judge VAN VOORHIS dissents and votes to reverse and to dismiss the claim upon the ground that no industrial accident was involved.


Summaries of

Claim of Luftig v. Stevenson Pie Co.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Sep 29, 1966
221 N.E.2d 171 (N.Y. 1966)
Case details for

Claim of Luftig v. Stevenson Pie Co.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of ALICE LUFTIG, Respondent, v. STEVENSON PIE…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Sep 29, 1966

Citations

221 N.E.2d 171 (N.Y. 1966)
221 N.E.2d 171
274 N.Y.S.2d 345

Citing Cases

Matter of Rosen v. Rose Housewares, Inc.

The conflict in the testimony as to the frequency of outside buying and as to whether consultations were…

Matter of Mendez v. Frisch Products Corp.

The board was not obligated to accept the testimony of the foreman and the credibility of such witnesses is a…