From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Lucius A.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 23, 1999
258 A.D.2d 389 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

February 23, 1999

Appeal from the Family Court, New York County (Richard Ross, J.).


The court's finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There was ample evidence supporting the elements of the crimes.

Based on the seriousness of the offenses, appellant's history of juvenile delinquency, truancy and behavioral problems, his continued fighting at Lincoln Hall, and his need for sex offender therapy and more intensive supervision in a structured setting to control and remedy his aggressive tendencies, the disposition was a proper exercise of discretion, in which the court adopted the least restrictive alternative consistent with appellant's needs ( see, Matter of Katherine W., 62 N.Y.2d 947).

Concur — Rubin, J. P., Mazzarelli, Andrias and Saxe, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of Lucius A.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 23, 1999
258 A.D.2d 389 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Matter of Lucius A.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of LUCIUS A., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 23, 1999

Citations

258 A.D.2d 389 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
683 N.Y.S.2d 850

Citing Cases

In re Los

"[T]he least restrictive alternative test does not require the court to actually try the lowest form of…