Opinion
November 7, 1991
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Ulster County (Torraca, J.).
We reject petitioner's contention that his designation as a central monitoring case was arbitrary and capricious. Adequate and sufficient reasons were set forth for his designation (see, People ex rel. Williams v. Ward, 73 A.D.2d 941). Furthermore, contrary to petitioner's contention, such a designation does not preclude him from participating in programs available to other prisoners (see, Matter of Ramirez v. Ward, 64 A.D.2d 995). Petitioner's remaining contentions have been considered and rejected as lacking in merit. Accordingly, the dismissal of the petition by Supreme Court must be upheld.
Weiss, J.P., Mikoll, Yesawich Jr., Crew III and Harvey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.