From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Lorenzo M. [2d Dept 1999

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 21, 1999
(N.Y. App. Div. Oct. 21, 1999)

Opinion

Submitted June 16, 1999

October 21, 1999

Monica Drinane, New York, N.Y. (Raymond E. Rogers of counsel), for appellant.

Michael D. Hess, Corporation Counsel, New York, N.Y. (Francis F. Caputo and Paul L. Herzfeld of counsel), for respondent.

GUY JAMES MANGANO, P.J., FRED T. SANTUCCI, GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, ANITA R. FLORIO, HOWARD MILLER, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

In a juvenile delinquency proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 3, the appeal is from an order of disposition of the Family Court, Kings County (Hepner, J.), dated October 28, 1997, which, upon a fact-finding order of the same court, also dated October 28, 1997, made after a hearing, finding that the appellant had committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crime of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree, adjudged him to be a juvenile delinquent and placed him with the Office of Children and Family Services for a period of 12 months. The appeal brings up for review the fact-finding order dated October 28, 1997.

ORDERED that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the presentment agency (cf., People v. Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620 ), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the appellant' s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt (see, Matter of David H., 69 N.Y.2d 792, 793 ; Matter of Antoine L., 248 A.D.2d 472 ; Family Ct Act 342.2; Matter of B., ___ A.D.2d ___ [decided herewith]). Additionally, "questions regarding the credibility of witnesses, as well as the weight of the evidence, are primarily matters to be resolved by the trier of fact. Its determination is accorded great deference as it had the opportunity to view the witnesses, hear their testimony, and observe their demeanor" (Matter of Severn J., 250 A.D.2d 682, 683 ; Matter of Antoine L., supra; Matter of Erik D., supra). Upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the findings of fact were not against the weight of the evidence (cf., CPL 470.15[5]).

MANGANO, P.J., SANTUCCI, KRAUSMAN, FLORIO, and H. MILLER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Lorenzo M. [2d Dept 1999

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 21, 1999
(N.Y. App. Div. Oct. 21, 1999)
Case details for

Matter of Lorenzo M. [2d Dept 1999

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF LORENZO M. (ANONYMOUS), appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 21, 1999

Citations

(N.Y. App. Div. Oct. 21, 1999)