Opinion
November 2, 1998
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Ain, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with one bill of costs.
The determination of the respondent New York State Division of Human Rights to dismiss the complaint of Marcella Hargrave on the ground of administrative convenience was not arbitrary ( see, Executive Law § 297 Exec. [3] [c]; Matter of Pan Am. World Airways v. New York State Human Rights Appeal Bd., 61 N.Y.2d 542; see also, Mitsubishi Bank v. New York State Div. of Human Rights, 176 A.D.2d 689; Eastman Chem. Prods. v. New York State Div. of Human Rights, 162 A.D.2d 157; cf., Matter of AMR Servs. Corp. v. New York State Div. of Human Rights, 214 A.D.2d 665).
We have examined the appellant's remaining contention and find it to be without merit.
Rosenblatt, J. P., Miller, Goldstein and McGinity, JJ., concur.