From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Lipshitz v. Hotel Charles

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 1, 1929
226 App. Div. 839 (N.Y. App. Div. 1929)

Opinion

May, 1929.


Upon the stipulation made in open court by counsel representing all parties that the court might amend the award to show by whom the Hotel Charles was operated, the court finds that Abraham Lipshitz, Louis Cohen and Kopel London, as copartners, were doing business as the Hotel Charles, and finding of fact numbered 1 is amended by inserting in the place of "Hotel Charles" the names of Abraham Lipshitz, Louis Cohen and Kopel London, as copartners doing business as the Hotel Charles; and the same insertion to be made in the award before the word "employer;" and as so amended the award is affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board against the insurance carrier, on the ground that the carrier has waived its right to declare the policy void by demanding and receiving a premium after the loss occurred. ( Peck v. Washington Life Ins. Co., 91 App. Div. 597, 600; affd., 181 N.Y. 585; Munn v. Masonic Life Assn., 115 App. Div. 855; affd., 189 N.Y. 486; Whipple v. Prudential Ins. Co., 222 id. 39; Phaenix Life Ins. Co. v. Raddin, 120 U.S. 183; Insurance Co. v. Norton, 96 id. 234.) The name of the insured in the policy is not always important if the intent to cover the risk is clear. ( Clinton v. Hope Ins. Co., 45 N.Y. 454; Weed v. Hamburg-Bremen Fire Ins. Co., 133 id. 394.) Van Kirk, P.J., Davis, Whitmyer, Hill and Hasbrouck, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Lipshitz v. Hotel Charles

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 1, 1929
226 App. Div. 839 (N.Y. App. Div. 1929)
Case details for

Matter of Lipshitz v. Hotel Charles

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of FRANCES LIPSHITZ, Respondent, against HOTEL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: May 1, 1929

Citations

226 App. Div. 839 (N.Y. App. Div. 1929)

Citing Cases

Zurich Insurance Co. v. Travelers Indem. Co.

In this connection, too, it has been held that the name of the insured as stated in the policy "is not always…

Trumbull Equities LLC. v. Mt Hawley Ins. Co.

Ins. Co. v. Shaker Pine Inc. , 262 AD2d 735,736–37 [3d Dept 1999] ). The fact that Alma is not specifically…