From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Levyn v. Ambach

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 15, 1982
438 N.E.2d 1125 (N.Y. 1982)

Opinion

Decided June 15, 1982

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department, LAWRENCE E. KAHN, J.

Paul Henry Janis and James R. Sandner for appellant.

Kenneth Pawson and Robert D. Stone for Gordon M. Ambach, as Commissioner of Education of the State of New York, respondent.

Andrew L. Sichenzie for Board of Education, Community School District No. 20 and another, respondents.



On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 N.Y.CRR 500.2 [b]), order affirmed, with costs. The commissioner is empowered to substitute his judgment of the proper penalty for that of the hearing panel whose action he was reviewing ( Matter of Shurgin v Ambach, 56 N.Y.2d 700). In fixing dismissal as the appropriate penalty, his decision to disregard the testimony of petitioner's psychiatrist was not arbitrary or capricious, inasmuch as the psychiatrist had commenced treatment after the events in question and had refused to express any opinion as to petitioner's functions as a teacher.

Concur: Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER.


Summaries of

Matter of Levyn v. Ambach

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 15, 1982
438 N.E.2d 1125 (N.Y. 1982)
Case details for

Matter of Levyn v. Ambach

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of BERNICE LEVYN, Appellant, v. GORDON M. AMBACH, as…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 15, 1982

Citations

438 N.E.2d 1125 (N.Y. 1982)
438 N.E.2d 1125
453 N.Y.S.2d 410

Citing Cases

Matter of Piazza v. Ambach

We further find that the imposition of a penalty different from that recommended by the hearing panel was…

Matter of Katz v. Ambach

Since the commissioner's broad authority of review within the educational system will not be overturned…