Opinion
November 21, 1994
Appeal from the Family Court, Kings County (Esquirol, J.).
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
We reject the appellant's contention that the Family Court should have dismissed the petition because a dispositional hearing was not timely held pursuant to Family Court Act § 350.1. On November 26, 1991, the appellant entered an admission to the petition, a fact-finding order was accordingly entered, and the court adjourned the matter to January 15, 1992, for a dispositional hearing. The appellant failed to appear for this hearing and an arrest warrant was issued. The appellant was not returned to the Family Court on the warrant until November 12, 1992, whereupon a dispositional hearing was promptly held.
Since the appellant was solely responsible for the delay in conducting the dispositional hearing due to his failure to appear, dismissal of the petition was not required (see, Matter of Jose R., 83 N.Y.2d 388). In light of the recent decision of the Court of Appeals in Matter of Jose R. (supra), we no longer follow our previous decision in Matter of Faruq F. ( 186 A.D.2d 799). Bracken, J.P., Balletta, Ritter, Pizzuto and Florio, JJ., concur.