Opinion
Argued January 6, 1931
Decided February 10, 1931
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.
Meyer Levy, James Murphy and Charles H. Friedrich for appellant.
Francis X. Hennessy for respondents.
The order should be interpreted as requiring the payment of the purchase price directly to the United States Trust Company, the substituted trustee. So interpreted the irregularities in the proceeding are formal rather than substantial.
The order should be affirmed, with costs.
CARDOZO, Ch. J., POUND, CRANE, LEHMAN, O'BRIEN and HUBBS, JJ., concur; KELLOGG, J., not sitting.
Order affirmed.