From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Lefkowitz v. Beame

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 17, 1976
52 A.D.2d 925 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)

Summary

In Lefkowitz v Beame (52 AD2d 925 [2d Dept 1975], the Court instructed that "Article 78 proceedings preferably should be heard and determined in a county in the judicial district in which the matter sought to be restrained originated, or where the material events occurred (see CPLR 506, Matter of Laqua v O'Connell, 280 AD31 [1d Dept 1952]."

Summary of this case from MATTER OF DEITCH v. CITY OF NEW YORK

Opinion

May 17, 1976


In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to compel appellants to specifically perform the conditions of a certain contract, the appeal (by permission) is from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, dated March 5, 1975, which denied the appellants' motion to change venue. Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Article 78 proceedings preferably should be heard and determined in a county in the judicial district in which the matter sought to be restrained originated, or where the material events occurred (see CPLR 506; Matter of Lacqua v O'Connell, 280 App. Div. 31). The real property involved herein is located in Richmond County; the order for its sale and the transfer of the proceeds of the sale to the Comptroller of the City of New York was made in Richmond County. The Staten Island War Memorial Association, Inc., has its principal office in the county in which the proceeding is pending. Special Term properly denied the motion by the appellants to change venue. Cohalan, Acting P.J., Damiani, Rabin, Titone and Hawkins, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Lefkowitz v. Beame

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 17, 1976
52 A.D.2d 925 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)

In Lefkowitz v Beame (52 AD2d 925 [2d Dept 1975], the Court instructed that "Article 78 proceedings preferably should be heard and determined in a county in the judicial district in which the matter sought to be restrained originated, or where the material events occurred (see CPLR 506, Matter of Laqua v O'Connell, 280 AD31 [1d Dept 1952]."

Summary of this case from MATTER OF DEITCH v. CITY OF NEW YORK
Case details for

Matter of Lefkowitz v. Beame

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of LOUIS J. LEFKOWITZ, Attorney-General of the State of New…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 17, 1976

Citations

52 A.D.2d 925 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)

Citing Cases

C. Schmidt & Sons, Inc. v. New York State Liquor Authority

Moreover, the venue of the proceeding complies with pertinent provisions of CPLR 506 (subd [b]). (See Matter…

Northeast Land Development Corp. v. Bertoli

A proceeding against a body or officer shall be commenced in any county within the judicial district where…