Opinion
August 11, 1997
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Milano, J.).
Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.
The petitioners failed to offer any additional, material facts which existed at the time the prior motion was made but were not known to them or the court, and therefore we find that the petitioners' motion is correctly denominated a motion for leave to reargue, not renew ( Mangine v. Keller, 182 A.D.2d 476, 477; Matter of Jones v. Marcy, 135 A.D.2d 887). No appeal lies from an order denying reargument ( King v. Rockaway One Co., 202 A.D.2d 395, 396; Matter of Jones v. Marcy, 135 A.D.2d 887, supra; Matter of Kadish v. Colombo, 121 A.D.2d 722).
Bracken, J.P., Miller, Sullivan and McGinity, JJ., concur.