From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Layton v. Spear Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 19, 1941
39 N.E.2d 259 (N.Y. 1941)

Summary

In Layton there was a division in this court (261 App. Div. 856) which dismissed the claim on authority of Johnson. The affirmance in the Court of Appeals was without opinion or comment and without any reference to its last previous decision on this subject in Bollard.

Summary of this case from Matter of Relkin v. Nat. Transp. Co.

Opinion

Submitted October 9, 1941

Decided November 19, 1941

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

John J. Bennett, Jr., Attorney-General ( John F. Loehr of counsel), for appellant.

Joseph F. Donovan for respondents.


Order affirmed, with costs against State Industrial Board. No opinion.

Concur: LEHMAN, Ch. J., LOUGHRAN, FINCH, RIPPEY, LEWIS, CONWAY and DESMOND, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of Layton v. Spear Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 19, 1941
39 N.E.2d 259 (N.Y. 1941)

In Layton there was a division in this court (261 App. Div. 856) which dismissed the claim on authority of Johnson. The affirmance in the Court of Appeals was without opinion or comment and without any reference to its last previous decision on this subject in Bollard.

Summary of this case from Matter of Relkin v. Nat. Transp. Co.
Case details for

Matter of Layton v. Spear Company

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of GEORGE S. LAYTON, SR., against SPEAR COMPANY…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Nov 19, 1941

Citations

39 N.E.2d 259 (N.Y. 1941)
39 N.E.2d 259

Citing Cases

Matter of Markowitz v. Mack Markowitz, Inc.

The Board therefore finds that the accidental injuries did not arise out of and in the course of employment."…

Matter of Relkin v. Nat. Transp. Co.

On the authority of Sztorc this court in Matter of Martino v. Blue Ridge Coal Co. ( 248 App. Div. 660)…