From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Lawrence

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 7, 1988
142 A.D.2d 950 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Opinion

July 7, 1988

Appeal from the Erie County Family Court, Notaro, J.

Present — Boomer, J.P., Green, Pine, Lawton and Davis, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Respondents seek reversal of an order of Family Court which terminated their parental rights on the ground that they are presently and for the foreseeable future unable by reason of mental illness to provide proper and adequate care for their two children. As ground for reversal, respondents argue that their right to counsel was abridged because their counsel were not present at their court-ordered psychiatric examinations. Although respondents were entitled to have their counsel present at the court-ordered psychiatric examinations if they so requested (see, Matter of Alexander L., 60 N.Y.2d 329, 332), there is no showing that they made any such request (see, Matter of Kevin R., 112 A.D.2d 462, lv denied 67 N.Y.2d 602). Further, respondents have failed to demonstrate that counsel's failure to attend the examinations rendered their assistance as counsel ineffective.

The record demonstrates that Family Court's determination terminating respondents' parental rights was supported by "clear and convincing proof" (Social Services Law § 384-b [g]) that respondents are presently and for the foreseeable future unable by reason of mental illness to provide proper and adequate care for their children (Social Services Law § 384-b [c]).


Summaries of

Matter of Lawrence

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 7, 1988
142 A.D.2d 950 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)
Case details for

Matter of Lawrence

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JOHN LAWRENCE M. (Appeal No. 1.)

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jul 7, 1988

Citations

142 A.D.2d 950 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Citing Cases

Matter of Rosemary

There is nothing in the record to confirm respondent's claim that his attorney never advised him of his right…

Matter of Jean

This testimony, together with that of an agency caseworker and the documentary evidence, was clearly…