From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Lautzenheiser v. Foster-Hatch Med. Group

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 2, 1937
251 App. Div. 913 (N.Y. App. Div. 1937)

Opinion

July 2, 1937.

Appeal from State Industrial Board.

Present — Hill, P.J., Rhodes, Crapser, Bliss and Heffernan, JJ.


The State Industrial Board has found that the claimant, while engaged in the regular course of his employment, sustained accidental injuries in the nature of hemorrhage from kidneys and subsequent pyelitis and that as the result he was totally disabled from June 8, 1934, to July 26, 1935, and totally disabled due to a recurrence of said injury from December 12, 1935, to May 22, 1936, on which latter date he was still disabled. On September 20, 1935, a lump sum award of $1,089 was made to claimant which has been paid. The instant award covers the twenty-two and one-seventh weeks period from December 12, 1935, to May 22, 1936, and the case is continued. The lump sum settlement covered practically the first period of disability, namely, from June 8, 1934, to July 26, 1935. The proof amply sustains the finding that the claimant was disabled during the period covered by the award. Such disability furnished ample reason for reopening the case and the making of an award for this latter period. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board.


Summaries of

Matter of Lautzenheiser v. Foster-Hatch Med. Group

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 2, 1937
251 App. Div. 913 (N.Y. App. Div. 1937)
Case details for

Matter of Lautzenheiser v. Foster-Hatch Med. Group

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of Dr. ROSS B. LAUTZENHEISER, Respondent…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jul 2, 1937

Citations

251 App. Div. 913 (N.Y. App. Div. 1937)

Citing Cases

Matter of Krosky v. Shell Oil Company

( Matter of Norton v. New York State Dept. of Public Works, 1 N.Y.2d 844; Matter of Palmeri v. du Pont de…