From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Lattanzi v. McCall

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 15, 1994
210 A.D.2d 729 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

December 15, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Albany County.


Upon review of the record, we conclude that there is substantial evidence to support the determination denying petitioner's applications for accidental and ordinary disability retirement benefits on the basis that petitioner, a parole officer, was not in service at the time of his injuries. The evidence indicates that petitioner was initially injured in an automobile accident en route to work and there is no indication he was performing any work function at that time. Under the circumstances, we agree that petitioner has failed to meet his burden of proving that he was in service at the time of his injuries.

Mikoll, J.P., Mercure, Crew III, White and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Matter of Lattanzi v. McCall

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 15, 1994
210 A.D.2d 729 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Matter of Lattanzi v. McCall

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of GARY LATTANZI, Petitioner, v. H. CARL McCALL, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Dec 15, 1994

Citations

210 A.D.2d 729 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
621 N.Y.S.2d 925

Citing Cases

Rosario v. N.Y. State Comptroller

After petitioner's testimony, the Retirement System promptly indicated that they took issue with whether…