From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Landrigan v. Landrigan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 9, 1989
146 A.D.2d 575 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Opinion

January 9, 1989

Appeal from the Family Court, Rockland County (Stanger, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The appellant's application for counsel fees contained only conclusory hearsay allegations by her attorney in support of her contention that she was unable to pay such fees. "[S]uch an award must be based on a showing of inability to pay, which was not demonstrated at bar" (Cook v Cook, 95 A.D.2d 768, 769; see also, Baynon v Baynon, 111 A.D.2d 733, 735; Furst v Furst, 88 A.D.2d 946; Standley v Standley, 83 A.D.2d 863, 864). Accordingly, the Family Court properly denied the application. Thompson, J.P., Rubin, Spatt and Balletta, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Landrigan v. Landrigan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 9, 1989
146 A.D.2d 575 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
Case details for

Matter of Landrigan v. Landrigan

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of COLIN B. LANDRIGAN, Respondent, v. THERESA B. LANDRIGAN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 9, 1989

Citations

146 A.D.2d 575 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Citing Cases

D'Errico v. D'Errico

In addition, we find no improvident exercise of discretion in connection with the award of visitation to the…