Opinion
November 10, 1998
Appeal from the Family Court, New York County (Susan Larabee, J.).
The court properly denied appellant's motion to suppress identification testimony. The prompt hospital showup was not suggestive. Appellant did not establish that a police officer had told the complainant that he would be viewing the individuals that cut him ( see also, People v. Stafford, 215 A.D.2d 212, lv denied 86 N.Y.2d 784). We have considered and rejected appellant's remaining contentions concerning the suppression issue.
The court's findings were based on legally sufficient evidence and were not against the weight of the evidence. There was ample evidence of appellant's accessorial liability.
Concur — Milonas, J. P., Ellerin, Rubin, Tom and Saxe, JJ.