From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Lakeview Futures v. Dept. of Fin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 6, 1994
210 A.D.2d 31 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

December 6, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County [Herman Cahn, J.].


Respondents' determination that petitioners' activities constituted an unincorporated business and are, therefore, subject to the unincorporated business tax is supported by substantial evidence. Petitioners, a registered futures commodities merchant and its sole general partner, engaged in futures commodities transactions on a retail basis and for their own account, and thus the exemption provided by section 11-502 (c) of the Administrative Code of the City of New York is inapplicable as petitioners were not trading solely for their own account. Petitioners have failed to carry their burden of proof to establish otherwise (Administrative Code § 11-529 [e]).

We have considered petitioners' other arguments and find them meritless.

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Sullivan, Kupferman, Asch and Tom, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of Lakeview Futures v. Dept. of Fin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 6, 1994
210 A.D.2d 31 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Matter of Lakeview Futures v. Dept. of Fin

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of LAKEVIEW FUTURES et al., Petitioners, v. DEPARTMENT OF…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 6, 1994

Citations

210 A.D.2d 31 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
618 N.Y.S.2d 818

Citing Cases

Matter of 680 Rlty. Part. v. Comm., D., Fin

It is not disputed that, while the notice of petition was filed within the four-month limitations period, the…

In re of Emerson Unitrust

trary to petitioners' contentions, section 11-2102 (b) (2) of the Code does not indicate that shares in…