From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Lacorte Elec. v. Cty. of Rensselaer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 29, 1993
195 A.D.2d 923 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

July 29, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Rensselaer County (Spain, J.).


On this appeal, petitioner contends that as the lowest bidder it was wrongfully deprived by the Rensselaer County Legislature of the contract for the electrical work to be performed on the County Public Safety Building in the City of Troy. The issues involved were adequately addressed by Supreme Court in a decision which denied petitioner's requested relief in all respects. We agree with the determination rendered and affirm for the reasons stated in Supreme Court's decision. We add only that a bidder's honesty, integrity, good faith and fair dealing are valid considerations regarding whether a lowest bidder is a responsible bidder, and a criminal investigation or indictment can provide a rational basis for finding that such bidder is not responsible (see, Matter of Schiavone Constr. Co. v. Larocca, 117 A.D.2d 440, 443, lv denied 68 N.Y.2d 610; see also, Matter of LaCorte Elec. Constr. Maintenance v. County of Rensselaer, 80 N.Y.2d 232, 236). Petitioner's prior felony conviction and willful violations of the Labor Law overcome its claim of bias and provide a rational basis for the County Legislature's determination that petitioner was not a responsible bidder (see, Matter of Schiavone Constr. Co. v. Larocca, supra, at 444).

Weiss, P.J., Mercure and Mahoney, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

Matter of Lacorte Elec. v. Cty. of Rensselaer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 29, 1993
195 A.D.2d 923 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

Matter of Lacorte Elec. v. Cty. of Rensselaer

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of LACORTE ELECTRICAL CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE, INC.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jul 29, 1993

Citations

195 A.D.2d 923 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
600 N.Y.S.2d 818

Citing Cases

Prote Contr. v. N.Y.C. Sch. Constr. Auth

olsch, Inc. v. New York City School Constr. Auth., 211 A.D.2d 680). These guidelines provide that all…

Matter of Tully Constr. Co., Inc. v. Hevesi

We find that the IAS Court erred in granting the article 78 petition, where, as here, the record reveals that…