From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Kurtz v. Town of Amherst

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 19, 1997
244 A.D.2d 895 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

November 19, 1997

(Appeals from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Mahoney, J. — Election Law.)

Present — Pine, J. P., Lawton, Hayes, Wisner and Boehm, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted the petition, found a referendum petition invalid and directed its removal from the ballot. The petition is invalid because the preamble fails to comply with the statutory requirement that the voter state that his "present place of residence is truly stated opposite [his] signature" (Election Law § 6-140 [a]; see, Election Law § 1-102; Town Law § 91; see generally, Matter of Graham v. City Clerk of City of Ogdensburg, 104 A.D.2d 703; Matter of Lindley v. Babylon Town Clerk, 80 A.D.2d 879, affd 53 N.Y.2d 683; Heath v. Town of Islip, 169 Misc.2d 382). In light of our decision, we do not reach the parties' remaining contentions.


Summaries of

Matter of Kurtz v. Town of Amherst

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 19, 1997
244 A.D.2d 895 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Matter of Kurtz v. Town of Amherst

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ELIZABETH C. KURTZ et al., Respondents, v. TOWN OF…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Nov 19, 1997

Citations

244 A.D.2d 895 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
665 N.Y.S.2d 129

Citing Cases

Mathewson v. Town of Kent

That procedure, set forth in Election law § 6–140(1)(a), provides that the preamble to any sheet for the…

In the Matter of Fisher v. Sampson

The court found that the petitioners' failure to join the Board of Elections as a party was a fatal defect…