From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Krevac v. 310 East 55th Street, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 15, 1941
261 App. Div. 860 (N.Y. App. Div. 1941)

Summary

In Matter of Krevac v. 310 East 55th St. (261 App. Div. 860) the power of the Board to set aside a decision disallowing an award and directing an award was affirmed upon the authority of Matter of Ingberg and this decision was affirmed (287 N.Y. 621).

Summary of this case from Matter of Parella v. Harrod Steel Erection

Opinion

January 15, 1941.

Present — Hill, P.J., Crapser, Bliss, Heffernan and Foster, JJ.


Acting under and pursuant to the provisions of section 123 Work. Comp. of the Workmen's Compensation Law, the State Industrial Board in the interest of justice properly reopened the case, set aside a previous decision disallowing the claim and made the award appealed from. The evidence amply supported the award and the State Industrial Board had jurisdiction to do so. ( Matter of Ingberg v. Zimmerman, 261 N.Y. 551.) Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board.


Summaries of

Matter of Krevac v. 310 East 55th Street, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 15, 1941
261 App. Div. 860 (N.Y. App. Div. 1941)

In Matter of Krevac v. 310 East 55th St. (261 App. Div. 860) the power of the Board to set aside a decision disallowing an award and directing an award was affirmed upon the authority of Matter of Ingberg and this decision was affirmed (287 N.Y. 621).

Summary of this case from Matter of Parella v. Harrod Steel Erection
Case details for

Matter of Krevac v. 310 East 55th Street, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of MICHAEL KREVAC, Respondent, against 310 EAST…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jan 15, 1941

Citations

261 App. Div. 860 (N.Y. App. Div. 1941)

Citing Cases

Matter of Parella v. Harrod Steel Erection

Against the argument of the carrier that the Board lacked this power, the award was affirmed. In Matter of…

Matter of Palmeri v. E.I. duPONT deNEMOURS

The continuing jurisdiction of the board (Workmen's Compensation Law, § 123) is broad enough to authorize…