From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Kreisler v. Dennis Bridgehampton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Oct 27, 1971
37 A.D.2d 891 (N.Y. App. Div. 1971)

Opinion

October 27, 1971


Appeal from a decision of the Workmen's Compensation Board, filed July 29, 1970, which determined that Dennis Bridgehampton Building Corp. was the special employer of claimant and Putpark Construction Co., Inc., his general employer. Various factors such as the right to control the methods of payment, the furnishing of equipment, the right to fire and the so-called relative nature of the work test are relevant in determining whether an employment exists, it being possible often to establish the relationship on the basis of one of these elements alone ( Matter of Bianculli v. Times Sq. Stores, 34 A.D.2d 696, 697). The board's factual determination should be upheld since the special employment it found is supported by substantial evidence, particularly as to the supervision of construction and of the finishing of houses claimant was engaged in as opposed to his usual work of carpenter supervisor (cf. Matter of Goodman v. Stone Webster Eng. Corp., 11 A.D.2d 558, 559), the absence of payment by his general employer for the day of the accident and the method of payment for work previously done by claimant for Dennis Bridgehampton. Decision affirmed, with one bill of costs to respondents filing briefs. Herlihy, P.J., Reynolds, Staley, Jr., Greenblott and Cooke, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Kreisler v. Dennis Bridgehampton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Oct 27, 1971
37 A.D.2d 891 (N.Y. App. Div. 1971)
Case details for

Matter of Kreisler v. Dennis Bridgehampton

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of SETH E. KREISLER, Respondent, v. DENNIS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Oct 27, 1971

Citations

37 A.D.2d 891 (N.Y. App. Div. 1971)

Citing Cases

McKissic v. Bodine

The phrase "economic reality" has received rather scant consideration in other jurisdictions. However, we do…