From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Koponen v. H.Z. Altberg, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 1, 1935
244 App. Div. 837 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)

Opinion

May, 1935.

Present — Hill, P.J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Bliss, JJ.


At the time of his injury and death the decedent was a journeyman electrician. He had not worked in the same employment during substantially the whole of the preceding year. In the same type of work, but in a different class, and in other employment, he had earned $952.40. The Industrial Board computed his annual earning capacity under subdivision 3 of section 14 Work. Comp. of the Workmen's Compensation Law. This was done by adding decedent's earnings to those of two other journeyman electricians in the same locality during the preceding year, and dividing the total by three. In this way the Board concluded that it had given consideration to decedent's previous earnings and to those of other employees in the same class and in the same employment, and in the same locality. No proof was offered to show that the "other employees" were not selected by the claimant because of their unusual earnings, and the employer offered no proof that many electricians were unemployed during the year, or had substantially smaller earnings. Thus it cannot be said that the other employees whose earnings were considered with those of the decedent were not a fair average of earnings in that employment. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board.


Summaries of

Matter of Koponen v. H.Z. Altberg, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 1, 1935
244 App. Div. 837 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)
Case details for

Matter of Koponen v. H.Z. Altberg, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of ALINA KOPONEN, Respondent, against H.Z…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: May 1, 1935

Citations

244 App. Div. 837 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)

Citing Cases

Matter of Beach v. Launder Needs Co.

den. 301 N.Y. 815.) Similar treatment was accorded the claimants in Matter of Price v. Bison Roofing Sheet…